Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elham Sarikhani's avatar

Dear Jeff,

I read your essay slowly, multiple times, because it was too recognizable to read quickly.

What struck me most was not only the intensity of your mind, or the way all five engines seem to run at once, or even the exhaustion of having people continue inside you after they have physically left. It was the paradox underneath it: the quiet you need is also the quiet that wounds you. Solitude becomes both sanctuary and evidence. It lowers the volume, but then some older wound steps forward and says, see, this is where you belong. Alone.

I understood that.

Perhaps not in the same form, but in the same architecture.

My nervous system was shaped differently too. Not by the same life, not with the same emotional weather, but by enough intensity, danger, exile, observation, and adaptation that I recognize what it means to live as if every ordinary moment arrives with too many layers. The world thinks it is having a conversation with you. Meanwhile, your body is tracking the child on the playground, the tone under the sentence, the shift in someone’s breath, the memory from thirteen years ago, the light through the trees, the coming responsibility, the hidden grief, the possible danger, the beauty, the cost.

People call this sensitivity when they want it to sound pretty.

It is not always pretty.

Sometimes it is a tax. Sometimes it is a gift with teeth. Sometimes it gives you beauty at a volume other people will never know, and sometimes it makes a park bench feel like a battlefield disguised as a pleasant afternoon. I've been there on that bench too many times.

What I wanted to tell you is this: I do not think you are broken. I also do not think this should be romanticized. That is the harder truth. There is power in being built this way, but also burden. There is perception, but also depletion. There is depth, but also the danger of drowning in one’s own depth and calling it identity.

You are still integrating. I say that with respect, not condescension.

I had to integrate some parts of myself too quickly because life did not give me the luxury of a gradual education. Eventful lives can force a person into premature architecture. We build bridges while the flood is already under our feet. But there is something I see in you that is still becoming, still organizing itself, still learning how to carry the full volume without letting the volume decide the whole life.

THAT is growth in real time.

I think barely anyone can speak to this from the inside. Many people will read you and admire the language, or diagnose the intensity, or tell you to rest, or tell you that your empathy is beautiful. Some of that may even be true. But I want to say something more precise: your gift is not only that you feel deeply. Your gift is that you can observe the machinery of your own depth while still being inside it. That is rare. That is painful. That is also the beginning of command.

But command cannot mean shutting it all down. And it cannot mean surrendering to all of it either.

The work, I think, is not to become quieter in the cheap sense. Not to become less alive. Not to amputate the sensory, emotional, intellectual, imaginational, psychomotor storm. The work is to build an inner council strong enough that no single engine gets to seize the throne. Not the wound. Not the loneliness. Not the beauty. Not the analysis. Not the exhaustion. Not even empathy.

Especially not empathy.

Because empathy without boundaries becomes self-erasure dressed as love.

And solitude without relation becomes a beautiful prison.

I say this as someone who knows something about beautiful prisons.

There is a place beyond survival where the question changes. It stops being only, how do I manage the volume? It becomes, what life can I build that honors the volume without being governed by it? What kind of love can exist without flooding me? What kind of solitude restores me without confirming the lie that I am unworthy of being held? What kind of presence can I offer others without disappearing into their weather?

Your essay felt, to me, like a man standing at that threshold.

On his way.

And I wanted you to know that someone across the world read it and did not merely understand the words. I recognized the room.

With care,

Elham

No posts

Ready for more?